Sunday, April 27, 2008

Texas, Bloody Texas. Cameron, Bloody Cameron.

Texas had 60% of the death penalties in the country in 2007. Of the 42 executions in the nation, 26 were in Texas. The next two highest states were Louisiana and Oklahoma, with 3 each. It is as if the proximity to Texas increased the numbers.

David Dow, a law teacher at the University of Houston believes the other states will continue to decline and soon Texas will have all the executions in the United States:

“The reason that Texas will end up monopolizing executions,” he said, “is because every other state will eliminate it de jure, as New Jersey did, or de facto, as other states have.”

The last man killed in Texas was Michael Richard. On September 25, the Supreme Court accepted a review of death by lethal injection in Baze v. Rees. That same day, Richard's lawyers came rushing in with a stay of execution a few minutes after 5:00 p.m. Presiding Judge Sharon Keller instructed the clerks, without consulting the other judges, to refuse the filing. That same evening Richard was executed.

In an Austin-American Statesman article, the judge in charge of the case Cheryl Johnson was quoted as saying her reaction was "utter dismay."

"And I was angry," she said. "If I'm in charge of the execution, I ought to have known about those things, and I ought to have been asked whether I was willing to stay late and accept those filings."

Overall, though, the number of executions are declining. And there is hope there will be fewer in Texas sent to death row because Life Without Parole is now available.

When Texas passed life without parole in 2005, it was already available in 47 states. Senator Eddie Lucio deserves the credit for its passage. Sen. Lucio sponsored the bill and was its primary moving force in the Senate. Gov. Perry signed it. Pax Christi members are grateful to Sen. Lucio for his support of the bill. We don't know if it would help him or hurt him to have our support, so we will leave that decision to him. I believe he has saved about 15 lives a year as a result of the change, and may begin to change Texas' reputation for being the most blood-thirsty of states.

As well as I can count by the numbers currently on death row are trending as follows:

2002 33
2003 28
2004 23
2005 15
2006 11
2007 15
2008 1 (to date)

The life without parole option is of course not the only factor in reducing the death penalty. DNA exonerations are also important. In 2001 Governor Rick Perry declared a legislative emergency after he pardoned a man who had served 15 years after being wrongfully convicted of rape. He fast-tracked a bill that allowed convicts to get state-funded DNA tests if biological evidence was available and they could show that ere was a reasonable chance of exoneration.

Of the first 32 tested in Dallas County, 12 were exonerated. On April 15, Dallas County announced its 16th exoneration. Even the Dallas Morning News, after a century of supporting the death penalty, declared that it doubted that Texas could guarantee "that every inmate it executes is truly guilty of murder."

In modern times, Cameron County has sent at least 6 people to their deaths by execution. One had never been to prison before, was identified, not at trial, but in a dying identification from a photograph. His last words: I am an innocent man, and something very wrong is taking place tonight. May God bless you all. I am ready.

11 comments:

Mas Triste said...

Sensei,

You would think that after 21 years on death row, another 5 minutes wouldn't hurt.

Then again, after 21 years on death row, 5 more minutes is too much.

Other than the 'possible' 8th Amendment death penalty stance that this described conservative court may or may not move to change, is there something specific about his case that is of interest?

K

StapletonAndStapleton said...

Now that we are back in the business of executions, perhaps Mr. Richard will be forgotten. If it had proved he was to be the last execution in American jurisprudence, the fact that the death was due to a refusal to accept a filing would be another one of those gory details that mark application of the death penalty.

As it is, the stay perhaps would have been for only a few months. Even then, the loss of the months to Mr. Richard would perhaps have been less important than the loss of fairness in allowing the filing rather than adhering to a 5 pm deadline.

That is one problem with the death penalty, though. Neither we, nor the state, nor Judge Keller should be making these decisions. We're not God.

Anonymous said...

Looking at the times (2 and 3 in the morning) in which you people post this junk, is it any wonder that neither of you make any sense???

Unknown said...

Mr. Ed,
To best of my understanding, Pax Christi for all practical purposes, is a communist organization. The ACLU (American Criminal Liberties Union) was founded by Atheist Communists, and continue still to champion Socialist causes. I hear you are considering running for Cameron County Sheriff on the Communist Party Ticket.
If you should succeed in Communizing south Texas, how do you plan to reconcile your anti death penalty stance with the Communist Party’s basic belief in eliminating all opposition by means of Summary Execution?
A horse is a horse unless of couse… sorry I forgot the words.
F.E.F.H.

StapletonAndStapleton said...

Dear Mr. Feed Em Fish Heads,

Your attack is not so much ad hominem as ad caballus. If you are afraid of horses, just admit it. Some cowboy you turned out to be. You wouldn't even make it on Brokeback Mountain. Your little brother can actually ride a horse. Even your sisters can probably ride horses. You probably play slow pitch softball.

Apparently, you have not been reading carefully. Raulito is moving away from communism and can you say that is not to my credit? I thought not. One communist convert in my corner. How many in yours and David Duke's?

Actually, ACLU did originally have some commie founders, but they threw them all out during the red scares. The organization really hasn't been worth much since. I think they might want to recruit some again and get something done.

Does this mean you won't be endorsing my candidacy?

StapletonAndStapleton said...

P.S.

Maybe that should have been ad caballum or ad caballem instead of ad caballus. It has been over 40 years since I took Latin and I wasn't very good at it then. Anyway, I'm trying to say you were not so much making a personal attack as a personal attack on a horse. Ad hominem attacks are supposed to be out of bound because not based on any logic related to the actually argument. However, I must admit, this horse thing is beginning to make a little sense to me.

Mas Triste said...

ES,


Everyone is very testy around here.
No facial expressions to analyze, I suppose.

I am not sure that the communism calls for execution, but the Stalinist practical application of communism seems to.

BTW, Raul is wearing down. MTV has launched a music viedo channel and they are broadcasting to all of Cuba. One fast look at the bling-bling and Raulito is out on his nalga.

Once again, capitalism conquers all.

K

Unknown said...

David Duke? (actually one of closest friends), Broke Back Mountain? My Sister's a horse's ass? (how did you know that). Talk about ad hominem attacks.
I was planning on supporting your candidacy, but given your attitude against gay cowboys I may have to rethink that plan.
FEFH

StapletonAndStapleton said...

Dear FEFH,

If you're not supporting me, I'm out. So I'm sending back all of the campaign contributions, except those I've needed for critical expenses.

It was not the gay cowboys, I was referring to on Brokeback, but the sheep.

I think you would be a bad influence, either way.

Of course I know about your sisters, FEFH. You think this blogging is really anonymous? For a mere $39.95 per month I have subscribed to a blogger's criss-cross directory that knows nearly as much about you as that skinny gal you used to haul around on the back of your motorcycle.

Unknown said...

Dear Mr Stapleton,
I want you to know that I think you are absolutely right about everything. I have been wrong to question your far superior intellect.
Do you think the INS knows about that $39 cross-reference thing?
My gosh and how did they know about the sheep? I had the curtains drawn.
If I should need legal services, would you consider defending me?
I have no money, but I can pay you with some really friendly ewes.
Sincerely,
L.D. Magilicuty

StapletonAndStapleton said...

Dear Mr. Magilicuty,

This brings us back to Kathy's question that I have heard hundreds of times over the last 28 years: "If you're so smart, why aren't we rich."

Yes, I'll defend you. What you do in the privacy of your own pasture is your business.

As a fee, a ewe would be nice, but in truth I miss the mules. Maybe a mild old Jenny, (stump broke) with a name like Tea Time or Lady.