How many Iraqis have been killed in the invasion? This is apparently not easily answered. President Bush said 30,000 in December of 2005. As large as this number is when tallying deaths, it was wildly inconsistent with a Lancet medical journal article of October 2006 that estimated 655,000 deaths as a result of war, with 601,000 of these from violence in war. This estimate was based on a study conducted by Johns Hopkins University.
After President Bush gave his 30,000 estimate Scott McClellan said on his behalf there was no official tally and Bush had gotten his number from the media. The Lancet article is a peer reviewed article using the type of national, cross-sectional cohort study of death used to find out how many people die from TB or malaria.
A group called Iraqi Body Count keeps a running tally that estimates today 88,373 to 96,466. Iraq Body Count uses reports from morgues and hospitals to produce their numbers. Lancet medical journal discusses the problem of relying on reports. When a whole family is killed there are often no reports made and some areas have stopped issuing death certificates at all.
The World Health Organization recently issued an estimate of 151,000.
However many the number may be, all guesses seem to concur that most of the deaths are civilians and many are children. Lancet estimates include children under 14, women and people over 65 years of age. One measure of percentage of deaths who are civilians can be based on the reports of Iraqi military deaths-between 4900 and 6375 according to WHO.
These numbers do not include the American deaths, some 3,915 according to WHO, or the 174 British forces killed.
Lancet stated, "In Iraq, as with other conflicts, civilians bear the consequences of warfare. In the Vietnam war, 3 million civilians died; in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, conflict has been responsible for 3.8 million deaths; and an estimated 200,000 of a total population of 800,000 died in conflict in East Timor. Recent estimates are that 200,000 people have died in Darfur over the past 31 months. We estimate that almost 655,000 people--2.5% of the population in the study area--have died in Iraq. Althou such death rates might be common in times of war, the combination of a long duration and tens of millions of people affected has made this the deadliest international conflict of the 21st Century."
A group called Just Foreign Policy posts a running extrapolation from the Lancet study that states the number of deaths at 1,273,378 as of today.
At some point an ocean of blood takes us beyond the ability to imagine. If the estimates of the number of deaths based on a Lancet study are correct, the death toll would have spilled some 6,500,000 quarts of blood. It only takes 600,000 quarts to fill an olympic size pool. Think of a thousand olympic pools filled with blood, and then it all begins to overflow and run out onto the ground. Irrigating what? What grows from this?
4 comments:
I have a grand newphew who has done two tours in Iraq as a medic. The thing he cannot get out of his head are the number of dead and wounded children he encountered. I have never understood why the so called liberal media has boycotted this story.
BObby Wc
Mr. Stapleton,
Uday and Qusay are most likely scorekeepers for Allah, I'm sure they'll lobby for justice.
I still like that "liberty, tyrant, blood from time to time" Jefferson quote.
Should we pull out abruptly,the butcher Pol Pot, would finally relinquish his #1 bad guy moniker.
ML
Consider it an answer to over population. I also believe that us leaving Irag will not stop the killing. That region of the world has always killed each other. At least if we are there we can try to point them in a direction that is beneficial to the USA.
thank you for reminding us of this piece of the evil use of our nation's resources. we are not allowed to view the bodies of soldiers (nor their injuries); there is no surprise that the administration's contempt for us would exclude this bit of reality.
Post a Comment